Cross-border payments are where margin quietly evaporates. The fees are real but unfamiliar: cross-border interchange, international scheme assessments, FX spreads, regional decline rates, chargeback rules that vary by country. Most platforms over-pay by 60–150 basis points without knowing the levers exist. We pull the receipts.
Engagement types
Cross-border audit
A 4–6 week engagement that maps your current cross-border cost structure transaction by transaction. We classify each fee, identify recoverable margin, and produce an executable optimization roadmap with expected basis-point impact for each lever.
Multi-acquirer rollout
Standing up regional acquiring relationships and the routing architecture that matches them. We run the acquirer RFPs, negotiate the regional contracts, design the routing logic, and oversee implementation through go-live and traffic ramp.
FX strategy
Choosing between processor-managed FX, multi-currency settlement, in-house FX (with a bank or non-bank counterparty), or hybrid models. The right answer depends on volume distribution, currency mix, and treasury appetite. We build the model, take the meetings, and document the decision.
Interchange optimization, in detail
Interchange is not a single rate. Visa publishes hundreds of categories; Mastercard publishes hundreds more. The category that applies to a transaction is determined by:
- The card type (consumer, commercial, prepaid, debit) and its issuing country.
- The merchant's MCC and acquirer relationship.
- The data submitted with the transaction (Level 2 / Level 3 enrichment, line-item detail).
- Authentication and tokenization posture (3DS, network tokens, NFC).
- Authorization vs capture timing, partial authorizations, refund handling.
Each of these is a knob. A diligent optimization moves multiple knobs at once and measures basis-point impact at the qualified-rate level. We have moved 30 to 80 basis points on B2B card volume and 10 to 35 on consumer card volume in our most recent engagements.
Multi-acquirer architecture
The classic question: should we route every transaction through one acquirer, or distribute across several? At sufficient scale, multi-acquirer wins on three axes — lower cross-border interchange, higher approval rates (regional issuers are more comfortable with regional acquirers), and stronger negotiating leverage. The implementation cost is real but bounded.
FX margin — the larger lever
For most cross-border merchants, FX margin is a bigger line item than card processing. A 2% FX spread on $100M annual cross-border volume is $2M. The same business obsessing over a 10 bps interchange improvement is leaving an order of magnitude more on the table in FX. We size both, and we tell you which one to attack first.